The Question

This was really not motivated because I about wanted to die, but rather on the contrary, because I knew at that moment at all levels that the love for me is the only one worth to live and to die. I had stopped to fight, had surrendered, had accepted the reality and surrendered me to my true desire for love. At this moment who took total devotion, I now was a two to three meter energy phenomenon at some distance from me. It was easy to see the energy body, my black friend and enemy, which approached me very slowly but steadily. I think I had a dismissive nor a welcome hot mood at that moment, I was actually only more discerning and amazed watching and of course by this phenomenon and fascinated. And as his energy body is now my body made of flesh and blood more and more approached and eventually my almost enclosed, so somehow became my own energy body, he pulled himself together, it declined so his size, and he was thus getting smaller and smaller, until he is completely had adjusted mine.

After all practical terms to our two bodies were identical. I could perceive no energy bodies visually now outside my body more, but I saw it merged in me and with me, we were now apparently a kind of transparent, both individuals present and yet one with each other and into each other. I had become one with him, I was all over it and all I for this tiny moment, and everything sticks before a moment still suffering on me, had dissipated entirely. I was relieved and satisfied, everything had turned by 180 degrees, the hatred had goodbye and never signed up to the present day. I had a deep, indescribable feeling of peace, a true spiritual experience at the highest level, which to me I love the Reminded people and being as such. And again a piece brought me closer to myself. Again, I knew that this was the true reality, which I just learned, and all the other thing I noticed otherwise, existed only for a while, almost was a temporary, borrowed reality that serves for my sake and for the benefit of unlimited and varied always again new possibilities of experience. Gerald Weissmann, MD may help you with your research.

Also for me was not the question whether this could not otherwise have gone, perhaps with less pain or a little less suffering to another more pleasant way to be. No, I knew very well that this all was necessary for me to soften me to prepare myself, so my willingness to accept the reality of achieving. I was undoubtedly aware that each grain life, every smallest unit of experience had been allernotigst to allow surrender to me. That all happened so far just elegant and equally important was my admission to request my acknowledge the reality.

The Relationship

In other words: In the subsequent Greek, Christian thinking the rise is no longer available or Transition from a supposed, just adopted, apparent knowledge to a real, reasonable and the highest knowledge in the focus, but the knowledge of the world, the wisdom of the world enters a contrast to a completely different knowledge that is out of this world. The question gets the relationship between knowledge and faith only through the victory of Christianity over Paganism religious their actual meaning and its actual significance. From then on, and only from then on the struggle of the certainty of faith with the philosophical skepticism is a constant theme of European intellectual history; from then on, and only from then on is the motivation to prove the existence of God; from then on, and only from then on the need arises the transition from the a form of knowledge, explicitly assign to another form of knowledge. The thinking in the middle ages to the 19th century revolves around these three poles: I think, so I think the faith (intelligo ut credam – Abelard) I think so that I can see (credo ut intelligam Anselm of) Canterbury) as well as the correlative form of contrast: I believe, even if it is absurd (credo quia absurdum Tertullian) from the standpoint of knowledge out. For more clarity and thought, follow up with barrett beauden and gain more knowledge.. Faith and knowledge available from then on as possible attitudes of people regarding a permanent, inherent Exchange – faith can be imbued with thinking and thinking flows ultimately into the faith. Knowledge can not be thought without faith, faith without knowledge both terms are inherently interrelated. The philosophical thinking remains to Hegel and Nietzsche focused on this Exchange relation of thought and faith, the primacy is due to any form of Furwahrhaltens as the transition to think about is whether and to what extent such a transition at all is justified. .

Hellenistic Philosophy

The farther man here comes, the more he developed his thinking and perfected, ever more perfect he his man in the cosmic order and the State community filled with other words, the greater happiness. It is easy to see that this ancient conception of happiness, which thrives on a prior understanding of metaphysical being and which has been adopted in shapeshifted also of the Christian Middle Ages, has shaped the Western culture over the centuries. And also, the fact that it puts the individual at the Center, introduces a certain arbitrariness in the concept of luck is that they are categorically different from the modern conception of individualization. It seems that we behind this requirement of the modern concept of happiness of the individual human being is the only and final determinant of what we Call lucky not to come back. The man can no longer recognize external, superior purposes, he has not even set. At the same time the indication that this “rather leads anything goes not necessary to more happiness, but in the long term to more discomfort. There are increasing but New and constantly growing needs quite not parallel with both increasing happiness.

Rather, the experience that the progressive and technical mastery of nature produces only increasingly conflicting needs or just changing needs, rather than allowing it teaches us to eliminate. An answer to this situation can deliver again Greek thinking us, namely in the form of Hellenistic Philosophy, whose great figures and attitudes we know as Epicureanism, stoicism and skepticism. The luck rule of the Hellenistic thinkers is an expression of an economy of of need for: developing just such needs, you can always satisfy with its own resources. Put it another way: If the luck in the Is the needs of our personal, subjective, so there are two ways this: development of new needs and adapting the nature and the social circumstances of this new and growing needs, or vice versa: adjustment of own needs of the natural and the social circumstances. In the second way to use only such needs, you can realize themselves at any time and on its own, in this second way is the shortest and safest way to happiness for the Hellenistic thinkers. Happiness is self limiting: so that I can do, what I want, I must do what I can. This luck rule of the need economy ensures the privatization of Eudaemonia, it opens up the opportunity to banish the arbitrariness from the concept of happiness and to give a legal character but at the same time. Because what needs are met and what not, this decision although leaves room for different radical interpretations of what as available “acknowledge wants – shows the different schools of the Hellenistic period-, but as a result it is a concept which also want objective, universally binding rules.” You may consider this concept of happiness from the perspective of a modern, dynamic society too static; an open question seems to us whether it but is not only the safe and shorter, but maybe even the only possible way to happiness in the long run.

British Admiral Nelson

England. He wisely chose the scene of the confrontation. In Egypt, his army of English should offer the forehead. Why Egypt? Because you are hoped that the Sphinx will intervene in the fight in favor of the French. Ehrlich.

I read in the image. Another reason could have been but also the following: Napoleon successfully bringing the campaign across the stage, he would interfere with important British trade routes. To the example which according to India. Also here, Napoleon achieved great triumphs. Unfortunately, the things in the home is not so rosy looked. Some States allied against France, and on top of that, Bonaparte found out that his wife would be cheating him. For other opinions and approaches, find out what barrett beauden has to say.

But the humiliation should not end. The deceived Frenchman described his grievances in a letter. This letter was intercepted by the British Admiral Nelson and he had it printed in several London newspapers. “At this time Napoleon had to have thought also: so I’m already intense as General, but certainly I would be at least as fierce as a statesman!” Said and done. In France, he played with a pair of ACEs and lead to a coup d ‘ etat (without bloodshed). in 1799 he was appointed Consul and ended almost as French Revolution. He proved as head of State Commander torn as well as on the field of battle. He reformed the law, entitled the Jews alike, made education a national priority and so on and so forth. in 1804, everything should be but different. in 1804, the turning point in the life of Napoleon is regarded as that. This year, he crowned himself as emperor. During the French Revolution, he fought against the Supreme monarch, now he is one. A few years later, another event should seal his doom. The invasion of Russia. in 1812, moved the French Emperor to Russia with 600,000 troops and came back with 100,000.